When someone leaves, there’s always a story. Sometimes it’s the story they tell you, but more often, it’s the story you tell yourself about why they left. And these two stories are rarely the same.
You might tell yourself they left because you weren’t enough. Because you were too much. Because you weren’t pretty enough, funny enough, successful enough. Because you said the wrong thing that one time. Because you weren’t emotionally available enough. We’re remarkably creative when it comes to blaming ourselves, and we’re equally creative at constructing narratives that make us the villains of other people’s stories.
But here’s what’s difficult to sit with: their reasons for leaving might have almost nothing to do with you.
The Stories We Create When People Leave
When someone leaves—a friend, a partner, a family member—our brains scramble for explanation. A void has been created, and we don’t like voids. We need to understand why. So we fill the silence with stories.
We tell ourselves it was about us being wrong. This is the most common one. We replay moments, searching for the exact thing we said or did that pushed them away. We magnify small moments into turning points. We assume we can identify the exact second we became unlovable. This narrative is oddly comforting—if it was something we did, then maybe we can do something different next time. Maybe we have control.
We tell ourselves we weren’t enough. Not enough attention. Not enough appreciation. Not enough success, beauty, kindness, patience. We’re convinced that if only we’d been more of something, they’d have stayed. This story is seductive because it offers a path forward: be more. Improve. Try harder. The implication being that love is something you have to earn by being worthy enough. Research from Verywell Mind on abandonment anxiety shows that people who internalize “I’m not enough” narratives often develop patterns of over-giving, over-explaining, and desperate attempts to prove their worth—all of which tend to push people further away.
We tell ourselves it was inevitable. This is the hopelessness story. They were always going to leave. Everyone always leaves. We’re fundamentally unlovable. This is less about what we did and more about who we are. It’s the darkest story, but for some reason, we find it easier to accept than to consider that their leaving might have nothing to do with our worthiness.
We tell ourselves they didn’t understand us. This story positions us as misunderstood—not bad, just unseen. If only they’d tried harder to understand who we really are, they would have stayed. This narrative protects our ego but also isolates us: if no one ever really understands, why try to be known?
The Stories We Don’t Tell Ourselves
The reason we don’t entertain other narratives is that they’re harder to sit with. Because the truth about why people leave often has nothing to do with your being enough or not enough.
People leave because they’re overwhelmed. Because they’re struggling with something you can’t fix. Because they’re in their own crisis and don’t have the capacity to show up for anyone else. Because they themselves are afraid of intimacy. Because they’re moving in a different direction than you are. Because their own unhealed wounds make closeness feel dangerous. Because they need something from the relationship that you cannot provide—not because you’re incapable, but because what they need doesn’t exist in the form you could give it.
People leave because they don’t know how to stay. Some people have so much inner turbulence that standing still feels impossible. They run not because you’re bad, but because staying would require them to face themselves, and they’re not ready for that.
People leave because timing is brutally unfair. You might be wonderful for each other, but not at the same moment. You might be what they need in five years, but they can’t wait five years. You might be exactly right, but the conditions of their life make being with you impossible.
These narratives don’t feel as emotionally satisfying as self-blame because they require you to hold complexity: someone can love you and still leave. Someone can think you’re great and still move on. Someone can value you and still choose differently. There’s no villain here. There’s just humans doing their best with what they have. According to insights from trauma researcher Bessel van der Kolk’s work on how we process loss and attachment, our brains are actually wired to seek meaning in departures, which is why we so readily construct self-blame narratives even when they’re not accurate.
Why We Prefer Self-Blame
It seems counterintuitive, but self-blame is actually easier than accepting that someone’s departure had nothing to do with your value. Because if you’re to blame, you have a path forward. You can fix yourself. You can be better. You can earn your way back into their love. There’s agency in blame, even when the blame is directed at yourself.
But when you accept that their reasons are about their own journey, their own capacity, their own timing—then you’re left with something harder: acceptance. You have to let them go without fixing anything. You have to be worthy and still not be chosen. That’s the real grief.
According to research from Psychology Today on processing grief and loss, people who can tolerate the ambiguity of a departure—where multiple things are true at once (they loved you and they left; you did nothing wrong and they still left; you’re a good person and they chose differently)—recover faster and build healthier relationships afterward.
The Story You Can Tell Yourself Instead
Here’s a different narrative: Sometimes people leave not because we were wrong, but because the season ended. Maybe we were perfect for where they needed to be at that moment, and then they needed to go somewhere else. Maybe they needed to learn something that only leaving could teach them. Maybe they needed to learn something about themselves that had nothing to do with us. Maybe they needed space, not because we were suffocating, but because they were running from something inside themselves.
And maybe—this is the hardest part—their leaving was the most loving thing they could have done. Because staying when they couldn’t be present would have been worse. Pretending when they were drowning would have been cruel. Staying out of obligation or guilt would have slowly poisoned everything.
None of this means you weren’t lovable. None of it means you failed. It means humans are complicated, timing is messy, and sometimes the greatest act of love is letting someone go to wherever they need to be.
The story you tell yourself about why someone left will shape how you move forward. If you tell yourself you’re unlovable, you’ll approach the next person with fear and desperation. If you tell yourself you’re wonderfully complex and sometimes that doesn’t fit with where someone else is headed, you’ll approach the next relationship with self-respect intact.
This week, if you’re sitting with a departure, try to identify the story you’ve been telling yourself. Is it about your being wrong? Not enough? Fundamentally unlovable? Then gently ask: What if it’s about something else entirely? What if it’s about their journey, their timing, their capacity? What if you’re still worthy, and they still had to go?
That narrative won’t erase the pain. But it might let you grieve what actually happened instead of grieving who you think you are.
💬 Was did you think of this article?
Tell us what was missing or what you'd like us to cover in more depth.
✉️ Send feedback
